Back In The Good Old Dayz.

The Journey To Great.

The Wherewithal Of A Legend.

Laugh Out Loud.

The Battle For Coca-Cola

The Battle For Coca-Cola
Rages On.

Ain't Nothing Like
The Real Thing, Maybe.

Last Blast Of Cool.

The Death Of Advertising.

I Don't Mean To Say
I Told You So, But...

It Is Futile to Resist,

Are Consumers Smarter
Then We Are?.

The Four Great Myths
Of Global Branding.

Agility In The Marketplace

Mitsu Who?

The Best Laid Plans
Of Mice And Men.

The Future As I See It.

Dare to Be Great:
The Mad Genius of "The Matrix
"

Some Nerve:
Did Coke Adapt "cool American
For Sprite?

 

 

THE BOY WHO BROKE MY HEART. Sometimes, in our quest to pass something on to the next generation, we invest a little too much of ourselves in the task. A few months back, one of the guys on the doublethink team brought a young writer to my attention. Well he wasn't really a writer, he was more of an idea guy. His ideas kept him up at night. His ideas drove him to flashes of brilliance and an almost megalomaniac world view of himself as being larger than life.


VOLUME
TWENTY-THREE
WEDNESDAY
FEBRUARY 8,
2004

And in many ways he actually did have the latent potential to become larger than life. I remember giving him an assignment on the Mitsubishi campaign and providing him 24 hours to get back to me with a list of potential theme lines. Two hours later I got an e-mail back from him, which I fully expected to be questions on strategy or clarification of Mitsubishi's market position.

I was shocked to find more than fifty tag lines, most of which we excellent. A few of which were brilliant. All of which were dead on strategy.

I think you should sue Coca-Cola for ripping off your "Cool American" campaign. I wasn't in love with the campaign, but their Sprite campaign is an obvious lift.-Angel Q. San Juan, PR

Do you think they would settle out of court for a couple of 12 packs?-HW

After reading last week's column I can see why you're so pissed off at Madison Ave. Shame on them. Jack B, Detroit

Shame on me for not going into construction-HW

It was obvious that this effort was effortless on his part. It was also obvious to me that I had seriously underestimated this young man's degree of sophistication. I was in some ways intimidated that someone so young and inexperienced could be so facile at such a difficult task as summing up an entire brand proposition in five words or less, over and over and over again.

On subsequent assignments, he performed equally as well. For all the world, I did truly believe that I had stumbled upon the next Ed McCabe or Gene Case. The undereducated master wordsmiths that defined the tone of advertising from the1970's and 1980's until this very day. This young man had the gift of plane talk with attitude that so many of us struggle with in draft after draft.

I knew I could polish him up just a little and his prose would shine like Pittsburgh steel. It wouldn't take much. A conversation about "tone of voice." A brief chat about ad copy Vs the King's English. A tad more on the use of sentence fragments and interior voice. He would be there. I knew his segment of the Mitsubishi campaign, set to the "tuners" and converted Street Racers would ring with clarion truth.

I was all set to make him a star.

And then he told me he was facing felony arrest. I won't go into the charges here because they are not relevant to the story. What is relevant is his reaction to the charges. No big deal. His scheduled appearance before the District Attorney last month. "Whatever."

The fact that the AP picked up the story and for the next five to ten years when ever a potential employer "googles" his name, his felonious escapades will seal his fate without so much as a second glance. "No big deal."

When did this Gen Y disconnection with common sense take over? Where was I? A few weeks back on the Adrants forum I had one of these Martians say to me, "what makes you think I want to be an Ad star. I just want to wear my jeans to work. Go figure.

So anyway, this outlaw kid was really getting to me. My ego trip went from making him the next Ed McCabe to converting him from pint sized Tony Soprano to the next Ed McCabe.

Then I stuck out my hand and latched back on to the plodding way freight of my own reality and got back to the mundane business of dropping off boxcars of marketing services to the rail sidings of enterprise. I am not a probation officer or a guidance counselor. I am not equipped emotionally or professionally to alter the life path of another human being, no matter what their generational letter. I'm just a lowly ad worker at toil in the fields of commerce.

So I took out my trusty gravity knife ( a holdover from my own misspent youth) and coolly cut the rope, casting my felony-bound genius adrift in his own world of benign neglect. That's when I realized my heart had been broken. Not in the sense of a lover's heartbreak. But in the sense of a potter's vessel or other water baring utensil. My heart could no longer carry the emotional contents of another human being just because of their gifted talents.

In some way I had contracted my would be protégé's ennui. My concern had migrated to detachment. My interest had transmigrated from swing the damned to giving support to the motivated. It was then that I began to gain a deeper understanding of the so-called disconnected generation. They are not disconnected because they were never connected. We as parents didn't carry them around in our arms the way our parents did with us, We sat them in front of our electronic surrogate, the TV set.

When they say "Whatever," it doesn't mean "whatever you say doesn't mean squat to me". It means, "Whatever happens, I have no control over it, so why be concerned."

It was like a visit to "Mr. Rogers Neighborhood", or the "Twilight Zone." Interesting for a moment but strangely irrelevant. So I shrugged and heard a small voice in the back of my head somewhere mutter "whatever." And all trace of the boy genius who would have been the next Ed McCabe was flushed away. Forever.

Once Upon A Time, Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse was regarded as an icon of worldwide mass marketing. But the changing times forced the Walt Disney company to alter its tactics, and embrace the concept of selective marketing, so in 1994, the company's Mouseworks Division was mandated to establish a new publishing niche: mass merchandiser-priced children's books, designed and priced to move fast in a high-speed selling environment--the discount chain toy departments.

The corporation already had long-standing licensee agreements with of number of children's book publishers, but it had decided to organize its own publishing arm in the children's book category. The division was organized to serve the digital inventory-controlled world of Target, Kmart, and Wal-Mart.

Things were definitely starting to click for the Mouseworks Division, but the group needed help from professionals from outside the "mouse house" to ensure that all bases were covered, specifically, a firm experienced in selective marketing practices.

They hired my firm smart communications, Inc. to help them accomplish their goals for the children's book line. In addition to our success in this area, we were a small firm, a decided advantage to a corporation the size of Disney, which needed to discreetly infiltrate a new market.

Smaller firms, such as mine, often can more easily navigate the intensely competitive waters populated by major corporations. In short, Mouseworks needed us to create demand among the toy department category managers at the discount mass merchandiser national chain stores.

Our test bed title was Snow White, whose release was intended to coincide with the multimillion-dollar limited-edition rerelease of "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" in home video. This launch was to be a proving ground for the power of a Disney "event" and its concomitant capability to drive add-on sales for the mass merchandise market--our target market. Given the Mouseworks Management GroupÕs tight media budget, my media team at SMART quickly discerned that the best approach was a direct one, to the discount chain store toy department managers; that is, the category managers of mass merchandisers such as Target, Kmart, and Wal-Mart. Mouseworks agreed.

Going in, we knew we had brand name awareness in our favor. In July 1994, the advertising agency Young & Rubicam had released the results of its Brand Asset Valuator study that charted the value of 6,000 brands in terms of relevance, familiarity, differentiation, and esteem throughout 19 countries. As reported in Adweek, "Among the highest-ranked properties globally was the Disney brand, which managed to transcend both national borders and age group demographics as a highly familiar, relevant, differentiated, and esteemed property."

Going against us, however, were two equally challenging opponents, one from inside and one from outside: Inside: At this point in time, interdivisional rivalry was at an all- time high at the Walt Disney Company. Division heads were under tremendous pressure to perform, and the Mouseworks group was no exception. Thus, "official" collaboration with other divisions was not a possibility. The Katzenberg and Eisner factions were at all out war with each other.

Our target market, the discount chain toy department managers, were reluctant to "rock the boat" by dealing directly with Disney, as many of them had ongoing successful relationships with distributors of Disney products. Furthermore, many had experienced or had heard about previous--failed-- attempts by Disney to deal directly with mass merchandisers in other product categories, and did not want to take a chance with Mouseworks' book line.

Once we recognized that we would not be getting a leg up from other Disney divisions, we knew we had to focus hard on our second objective: profiling our target market carefully and completely. SMART's first tasks, then, were to identify and determine how to reach the this small, fast-moving, and hard-to-hit market. Identifying who these people were was the easy part.

Here are the demographics we identified for discount chain store toy department managers: They number approximately 1,500 individuals nationwide. They are generally high-energy, 20-something go-getters living in a world of licensed toys and Saturday morning television. They work "on the move," attending meetings and traveling in the field, buying for regions or groups of mass merchandiser retail megastores.

They think and speak of "footprints," the number of square inches of floor space a given point-of-purchase display will require, and how much revenue the given item will earn in the f ootprint. Although there is no member organization for category managers, these professionals belong to one or more toy industry organizations. They track vigilantly the information published in trade publications such as Discount Store News. They are continuously bombarded with new product deals and pitches, and therefore are not easy to impress.

Most important, we learned that, in the toy category, children's books are a low-interest item, and thus, direct sales efforts generally fall upon deaf ears, Disney characters notwithstanding. Clearly, we couldn't do anything to change the politicking then going on inside Disney, and thus get the help of other divisions to promote the Mouseworks titles; neither could we afford to sit back and count on the power of the Disney name in this fast-forward arena.

Our research indicated that Mouseworks would have to get out in the field and prove the merits of its brand products just like everybody else. Our first move was make use of the category managers' involvement with the toy industry organizations; this link provided a viable grapevine for disseminating information--which we promptly began to do.

The first Mouseworks press release to the mass merchant retailers read, "Disney is the closest thing to a guaranteed sale," and went on to tout Disney's trademark characteristics of energy, quality, and creativity, citing the sales generation power of [such titles as] "101 Dalmatians," "Aladdin,' "Beauty and the Beast,'" and others. This was a good beginning, but hardly enough to compel wary and sales-savvy category managers to deal directly with Disney, for many of these pros we interviewed alluded to Disney "talking the talk but not walking the walk" on the back end of the sale.

Specifically, our selected target, the toy department managers, wanted to know: Is the product on the planogram? Does the vendor have up-to-the-minute electronic data interchange capabilities? Is Saturday morning television support in place? At what spending level? What's the "pull-through?" Are there movie tie-ins?

The electronic technology revolution has changed the playing field. But at that point, Disney ads in Discount Store News did not even include a toll-free phone number. And there were no cross-promotions to home video and children's furniture categories, elements strongly advocated

Although at the outset they were unprepared in the then-new high-tech world of electronic marketing techniques, Mouseworks staff hit the floor running. They utilized planogram shelf space management programs and just-in-time inventory control. Mouseworks trade advertising efforts raised awareness for Mouseworks when direct sales reps came to call. Slowly but surely, Mouseworks made it into the mass booksellers.

But mass merchandise discount retailers were still playing hard to get. And though Mouseworks kiosks were being placed and were generating some business, they were not being serviced rapidly enough to suit the quick-turn demands of the category managers.

So Mouseworks put its executives on the road to do store checks and shelf detailing. A volume pricing schedule was established that worked on a sliding scale with options for nonreturnable terms. SMART initially suggested targeting retail buyers of the Snow White video for a surefire add-on sales opportunity. The objective was to build direct distribution relationships with the video buyers as well as the toy buyers within the mass merchandising universe. We believed that if the Mouseworks kiosks were located near the video racks, the books would become an impulse purchase.

This concept was given the thumbs-down from both Disney and the mass merchandisers, who contended that Snow White would just "have to fight it out" in the toy department alongside every other children's book title.

SMART' s objective then evolved to build a Mouseworks franchise, which would accomplish two essential goals: Prevent confusion of the Mouseworks imprint with that of licensee Crown Books, which already marketed Disney titles. Commandeer valuable floor space to enable maximum impact and room for tie-in product display.

Critical to achieving these goals was a stand-alone display area that would make it possible for the Mouseworks books to be shelved "cover up" instead of "spine up," the traditional display format for mass-merchandised children's books. Further, this display would enable the proper positioning of smaller tie-in titles featuring foil-stamped, pop-up, and "squeeze me" inserts. Mouseworks' intent was that the tie-in products would be near, or preferably next to, their flagship book for maximum impact--to successfully "piggyback" with the Snow White video launch.

These objectives were easier said than accomplished, however, because all our selected targets cared about was that every square inch of selling space in their respective departments feature products that would, performance-wise, stack up against perennial favorites including Barbie, Thomas the Tank Engine or Hot Wheels.

To them, it was not a foregone conclusion that because Disney was spending $8.5 million to launch the Snow White video, sales of Mouseworks' Snow White book would make it a slam dunk worthy of premium floor space consideration.

SMART quickly recognized that to motivate these reluctant decision makers--our selected target --we had to sell the idea of Snow White titles as the product, not the Mouseworks imprint as the product. After all, it was Snow White who had been a best-seller long before Barbie and Hot Wheels were even a gleam in Mattel's eye. The title had a history of success that predated Saturday morning children's programming--indeed, even television itself. Simply put, when it came to best-sellers, Disney wrote the book. And that's precisely the point SMART drove home in the ads it placed for Mouseworks.

To complement the print ad campaign, Mouseworks designed a quick-to-assemble, small-footprint point-of-purchase display that could accommodate all the Snow White titles--covers up--including the "value-added line extensions" of the foil-stamped, pop-up, and squeeze-me books. This display proved to make such efficient use of valuable selling "real estate" that the trade embraced it enthusiastically.

Snow White was followed by her sibling characters in the enormously popular Lion King series, and Mouseworks was off and running.

Because interdivisional rivalry at Disney during the period SMART worked with the corporate giant was so intense and ingrained, we quickly realized that we would have to attack the project from "outside"; specifically, that we would have to find the information and support we needed from the target market itself--in this case, discount store toy managers.

Furthermore, it is imperative to learn how to talk to the trade effectively; because they are "insiders," they have seen and heard all the marketing claims and hype, and thus are more difficult to impress. They are also reluctant to "rock the boat," as we found when trying to convince them to deal directly with Disney, and to break long-standing distributor relationships.

Finally, they cannot be convinced to "sublet" valuable selling floor real estate based on brand name alone, even when that name carries the history and cachet of Disney. Mass merchandisers want to hear about price and value, and when you convince them your product offers those factors, category manager will generally give such items preferred, or power aisle locations, which can increase your product's sales by as much as 50 percent.

Fight Club Takes Their Show On the Road. Well I guess it had to happen sooner or later. Our accelerated "Big Idea" course at California State University has been picked up by three corporate organizations for their Marketing Staffs. The Seminar style 3-day immersion courses will be given in San Francisco, Las Vegas and Seattle this coming June. The 16 week curriculum will be telescoped into 12 two hour workshops over a 3 day weekend. Each of the courses will be attended by 24-32 marketing and sales executives across several business units of the host corporations. The basic thrust of the Fight Club curriculum is to train senior management in the ways in which idea generation can be brought to bare in leveraging demand creation and competitive advantage in the global marketplace. If your company would be interested in hosting a Fight Club Big Idea course you can contact our Seminar Coordinator Monica Erne at monica@MadisonAveNew.com

Stay Tuned.

MARKETERS FROM
THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES
READ MADISON AVENEW:

OGILVY & MATHER
MULLEN ADVERTISING
THE MARTIN AGENCY
TBWA CHAIT/DAY
GSD&M
YOUNG&RUBICAM
McCANN-ERICKSON
LEO BURNETT USA
PUBLICIS
FOOTE,CONE,BELDING
GREY ADVERTISING
HILL, HOLIDAY
LANDOR ASSOCIATES
MODEM MEDIA
BUMBLE WARD & ASSOCIATES
WPP GROUP
DAVID & GOLIATH
LOWE LINTAS
BRODEUR PORTER NOVELLI
INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COS
SULLIVAN, HIGDON & SINK

NOBLE & ASSOCIATES
BBDO NY

SAATCHI AND SAATCH
FLEISHMAN HILLIARD
LTC/GSD&M
WONG DOODY

HAL RINEY & PARTNERS
DEUTSCH, INC.
DDB NEEDHAM
CIMARRON GROUP
CAMPBELL EWALD
ZENTROPHY
HILL & KNOWLTON
US WEB

J. WALTER THOMPSON USA
JAGER DI PAOLA KEMP
TRUE NORTH COMMUNICATIONS
CHICAGO CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP
D'ARCY MASIUS BENTON & BOWLES

MODERNISTA
BRAVO GROUP
HAL RINEY & PARTNERS

DAI WORLDWIDE
ORGANIC ONLINE

ADRANTS
NEW YORK TIMES
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
NEW YORK OBSERVER
BRANDWEEK
ADWEEK
LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL
DOW JONES
LEXIS-NEXIS
COX NEWSPAPERS
PUBLIC INTEREST NETWORK
MONSTER WORLDWIDE
HOUGHTON MIFFIN COMPANY
REUTERS INFORMATION
CMP PUBLICATIONS, INC.
HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS
MERIDITH CORPORATION
THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES
THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL
LOS ANGELES TIMES
GETTY IMAGES
CNET

BANK OF AMERICA
NATIONSBANK
THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP
INDYMAC BANCORP
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE
KMPG/PEAT MARWICK
DEAN WITTER
VERISIGN

INVESTORS BANK & TRUST
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING
MUTUAL LIFE OF CANADA
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
RELIASTAR FINANCIAL
CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.,INC.
PRICE WATERHOUSE


GENERAL MOTORS
MERCEDES-B ENZ OF N.A.

FORD MOTOR CO
MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES OF AMERICA
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA
CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP


MICROSOFT CORP
SUN MICROSYSTEMS
CISCO SYSTEMS
IBM CORPORATION
PULITZER TECHNOLOGIES
DIEBOLD
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS
NEW DREAM NETWORK
EQUINIX, INC.

SYMANTEC

AG TECHNOLOGIES

ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES
THE LIMITED, INC.
TIFFANY CO.

BOEING
AMACO CORPORATION

20TH CENTURY FOX
DIRECTV
VISABLE WORLD, INC.
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSAL STUDIOS
DISNEY WORLDWIDE SERVICES,
INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE MANAGEMENT
CAA
THE BRODER KURLAND WEBB UFFNAR AGENCY
HOLLYWOOD GOWER CENTERH
SCREENVISION
EMERILS HOMEBASE
BARNES & NOBLE.
FANDANGO
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
TICKETMASTER
PUBLIC BROADCASTING CO.
CLEAR CHANNEL WORLDWIDE
ESPN

ALLTEL CORP
EARTHLINK, INC
ALLTEL INFORMATION SERVICES
TIME WARNER TELECOM
XO COMMUNICATIONS
ALLEGIANCE TELECOM
INTERNET ALLEGIANCE, INC.
UUNET TECHNOLOGIES
VERIZON
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS
GLOBAL CROSSINGS
ITC DELTACOM
GTE GOVT. SYSTEMS CORP
VERIZON WIRELESS
T-MOBILE USA
ROGERS MEDIA, INC.
UUNET SOUTH AFRICA
INTELLISPACE


UNITED SPACE ALLIANCE
NASA
PORT AUTHORITY OF NY NJ
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

DELTA AIR LINES
S.C. JOHNSON WAX
MERCK & CO.
KAISER PERMIANENTE
CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSN
STARBUCKS COFFEE CO
THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE
COMPANY
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
DR PEPPER/SEVEN UP
RCN CORPORATION
HOTJOBS.COM
PFIZER
IKEA NA SERVICES
TISHMAN SPEYER PROPERTIES
HEINZ SERVICE COMPANY
RIVES CARLBERG, INC
KINKOS, INC
McKINSEY & COMPANY, 1NC.

WELCOME

DIGITAS
MERRIL LYNCH
SAVVIS
MCA, INC,
THE ROMANN GROUP
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL
STATE OF OHIO NETWORK
CALIFORNIA STATE
DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES

And You.


     
       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FINE PRINT

1. All comments, images, ideas and thoughts on Madison AveNew are property of their authors, reproduction without the author’s permission is strictly prohibited.
2. By sending comments you give us permission to use them in our monthly Retrospect to highlight the best discussions of each month.
3. Keep in mind that your comments could potentially be used in varied Madison AveNew promotional pieces (we will contact you if such is the case).
4. Madison AveNew reserves the right to delete any comment deemed offensive or unnecessary.
5.All material originated for MadisonAvenew.com is ©2005 Smart Communications, Inc. All Rights Are Reserved. Reprint rights available by request.